To do that, we are going to be using a new test system for entry-level coolers in a closed case using a Ryzen 9 5950X that has been modified to run at three different thermal loads. But at the same time, you also have to remember that this engineering has lasted the test of time, so obviously there has got to be something to it, especially since you guys are all recommending that we look at this again in 2021. It’s meant to basically replace your stock cooler, give you lower temperatures and less noise, and do so at an attractive prices. Before we jump in I really want it to mention again that this cooler is not meant to compete with high-end solutions.
![cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156 cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156](https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImage/35-103-099-08.jpg)
That pretty much wraps up the installation process, so it’s time to move on to performance. But I’m going to try and recreate that with a separate SickleFlow fan than I have from another Cooler Master cooler and install that onto the 212 Evo, because we couldn’t actually find a V2 version in time for this review.
Cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156 series#
There is also an updated SickleFlow series fan for better acoustics and airflow at lower RPMs. First, the V2 version comes with a new stepped back heatpipe design for a little bit better memory compatibility, along with a revised mounting kit, and that is super important like we are going to see pretty soon because the original 212 Evo has an ancient mounting kit that is just a bunch of parts and is a pain in the butt to install. That V2 version isn’t meant as a replacement for the original 212 Evo, rather it’s being sold right along in parallel with it, and it has a bunch of improvements that you need to know about to make a more informed buying decision. There is now a V2 version of this that isn’t quite as widely available, but it’s out there and it cost just a little bit more. Keep in mind these calculations are provided for demonstration purposes only and may not reflect the actual lab tested C/W rating, but we're pretty close.I also want to address the elephant in the room and that is how Cooler Master has modified this cooler over time. The Overclocked numbers are about right and align with the Hyper 212 Black Edition which show the limitation of the SickleFlow fan and PWM fan curves.
![cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156 cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156](https://www.incehesap.com/resim/icerik/5f3e3861bd2d7.jpeg)
(Ryzen, LGA 2011 etc.) When looking at raw temperatures the 64c load temps at the default speed were higher than expected and improved quite a bit once the second fan was added. Of course if the Hyper 212 EVO V2 can handle a Core i9 9900k it also means it can handle any other CPU around the 130w range.
![cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156 cooler master hyper 212 evo install 1155 1156](https://pcper.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/6edc-212-evo-black-edition-boxes.jpg)
(aka not good for overclocking)Īs the charts show we have a heatsink that can clearly handle a Core i9 9900k despite the logic of using a “budget” cooler on a $500USD processor. These numbers can be used to determine heat capacity, the larger the difference the less efficient the heatsink is. The resulting C/W number is used to rate how efficient a heatsink or waterblock is based on the given heat load. This is why we normally only apply 85% of the total wattage output to our heat calculations. Since this is a real world testing method we need to take into consideration real world variables and estimate tolerances. In our heatsink and waterblock tests we don't really focus on overall load temperatures but rather how well the product can remove heat given a specified heat load.